Question
Assalamu alaykum, I have been living in Canada for five years with my wife and our three children. We are Moroccan. We do not know how long we will remain here—one year, ten years, or the rest of our lives—as we still hope to return and settle in Morocco, although we do not know whether this will ever be possible or, if so, when. We currently pay CAD 2,550 per month in rent. We have no retirement savings or pension in Canada, and our combined retirement income in Morocco would not even be sufficient to cover rent here. We are concerned about reaching old age without being able to afford decent housing. Our hoped-for return to Morocco faces several concrete and significant difficulties: a difficult job market that would require both of us to find sufficiently well-paid positions, significantly higher living costs and higher-education expenses compared with Canada, and the fact that our eldest daughter has just started university here. Returning would either force her to interrupt her studies or require her to remain in Canada on her own. I mention these circumstances so that you understand that our uncertainty is not simply a matter of personal preference or feelings, but is based on serious practical obstacles. I would like to purchase a primary residence in order to reduce the risk of being unable to afford decent housing when we reach retirement age. I am therefore presenting my situation to you with complete transparency. I own two apartments in Morocco. If I sold them and added our savings, we would be able to cover approximately 70–75% of the price of a modest house here. The remaining 25–30% would still represent a substantial amount that would be difficult to accumulate through savings or obtain through a private loan over the long term. In addition, transferring these funds from Morocco to Canada would most likely be impossible, or at the very least administratively very difficult, with no guarantee that the transfer could ultimately be completed. In other words, even selling the apartments, with all the difficulties involved, would not necessarily solve the problem. I would also like to clarify that I do not wish to sell these apartments because they are our connection to Morocco and the place where we stay when we visit. Selling them would also make a potential return to Morocco even more difficult. I mention this for the sake of complete honesty, and I leave it to your judgment as to whether, despite these circumstances, I would nevertheless be religiously required to sell them. Before considering a conventional bank loan, I first explored the Islamic financing options available here. I found two providers, Eqraz and Manzil, and both appear to me to be costly and of questionable Shariah compliance. The first, Eqraz, operates through a commodity Murabaha (Tawarruq) structure, at a cost close to twice that of a conventional mortgage. The second, Manzil, presents its product as a diminishing Musharakah, at a rate of approximately 6.3%, compared with approximately 4.3% for a conventional bank. After examining its contract in detail, I identified several elements that make me question whether it is truly a Musharakah rather than an interest-based loan structured differently. In particular: In the event of a loss, the financier bears only 0.00001% of the loss while I bear virtually all of it, whereas in a Musharakah losses should generally be shared according to the partners' respective capital contributions. The financier's shares are always purchased back at their nominal value and never at market value, which appears to guarantee the return of its capital. Its return is not structured as rent corresponding to its ownership share of the property. Instead, it is calculated based on the outstanding capital multiplied by a rate indexed to the Canadian five-year government bond yield plus a margin, which appears to resemble an interest-based formula. All costs associated with ownership, including property taxes, maintenance and insurance, are exclusively my responsibility. The transaction is registered on the land title as a first-ranking mortgage in its favour. I hold legal title only as a trustee on behalf of the fund, with an irrevocable power of attorney granted in its favour. Finally, there is a clause preventing me from challenging the religious compliance of the product and submitting such matters exclusively to the fund's Shariah board. I can provide you with my complete analysis of the contract if that would be useful. Despite these concerns, I submitted an application for financing with Manzil. Based on my professional situation, they would only provide financing of up to CAD 479,000, with a required 20% down payment. I do not have this amount available in savings and would have to borrow part of it, interest-free, from relatives. Furthermore, this approval is only verbal and non-binding on their part, and the organization has informed me that it would not have funds available for disbursement before January 2027 at the earliest, with no certainty that funding would actually be available at that time. In addition, this amount would not allow us to purchase a home that adequately meets our family's needs: sufficient space for three children, including two teenage boys who cannot reasonably continue sharing the same bedroom, and a location that would allow our children to remain in their current schools and preserve their educational stability at an important stage of their studies. I am not seeking a luxurious home. I am seeking a home that is adequate and reasonably suitable for our family. Nevertheless, I leave it to your judgment to determine what may legitimately be considered a genuine need in our particular circumstances. Finally, I obtained a mortgage pre-approval from a conventional bank for up to CAD 600,000. Combined with our available down payment, this amount would actually allow us to purchase a suitable home for our family. Therefore, at this point, a conventional mortgage is the only practical avenue that would allow us to purchase a suitable primary residence, which is precisely why I am seeking your guidance. My question is: Given the circumstances described above, would I be Islamically permitted to purchase my primary residence in Canada through a conventional bank mortgage involving interest (riba)? I sincerely wish to receive the answer according to what is true and correct from an Islamic perspective, even if the answer is unfavorable to me. Jazakum Allahu khayran for your time and consideration. May Allah reward you abundantly. Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh,
Answer
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
As-salāmu ‘alaykum wa-rahmatullāhi wa-barakātuh.
Brother in Islam,
We appreciate the honesty and detail with which you presented your situation, and your wish to know what is correct even if it goes against you.
You mention that you have lived in Canada with your wife and three children for five years. You pay CAD 2,550 per month in rent, you have no retirement savings in Canada, and you are concerned about affording decent housing in old age. You own two apartments in Morocco, which would not fully cover a house here and would be difficult to transfer. The Islamic financing options you explored were costly, limited in amount, and uncertain in timing. You hold a conventional mortgage pre-approval of CAD 600,000, and you ask whether you may buy your primary residence through it.
At the outset, our answer will not address the products of Eqraz or Manzil. Concerns about the Shariah compliance of a specific product should be brought directly to that provider's Shariah board, which is responsible for its structure and implementation.
In principle, ribā is prohibited in the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and the prohibition covers the one who pays it as well as the one who receives it. Allah Ta‘ālā says:
وَأَحَلَّ اللَّهُ الْبَيْعَ وَحَرَّمَ الرِّبَا (٢:٢٧٥)
Translation: Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden ribā.
Jābir raḍiyallāhu ‘anhu narrates:
لَعَنَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ آكِلَ الرِّبَا وَمُؤْكِلَهُ وَكَاتِبَهُ وَشَاهِدَيْهِ وَقَالَ هُمْ سَوَاءٌ (رواه مسلم:1598)
Translation: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ cursed the one who consumes ribā, the one who pays it, the one who records it and its two witnesses, and he said: they are all equal.
A prohibition of this level is only lifted by ḍarūrah, a genuine necessity. The jurists define ḍarūrah as reaching a state in which, if one does not take the prohibited thing, one would perish or come close to it. Even then, the exemption is limited to the extent of the need. It permits only what is required to remove that necessity, and once the necessity is met by any means, the exemption ends.
Accordingly, having a roof over one's head is a necessity. However, the necessity is shelter, not ownership. Whatever means secures that shelter fulfills the need, and once it is fulfilled the necessity no longer exists. Where rentals are widely available, as they are in Canada and as you are presently living in one, purchasing a house does not constitute a necessity that would justify a mortgage. This holds whether the house is a primary residence or otherwise.
Similarly, housing being expensive, or being unable to save enough to purchase, is not a justification. Most people who rent are in exactly this position, and if it were accepted as a necessity, the prohibition of ribā in home purchases would have no practical meaning.
Likewise, a hardship that is not presently occurring, such as the concern about affording housing in old age, does not make something permissible now. A ḍarūrah must be present and real, not anticipated. The future is in the hands of Allah, and a fear about it cannot be used to permit ribā today.
Furthermor, the angle of barakah must also be considered. Barakah is being able to do more with less. Allah Ta‘ālā says:
يَمْحَقُ اللَّهُ الرِّبَا وَيُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ (٢:٢٧٦)
Translation: Allah destroys ribā and increases charity.
وَمَن يَتَّقِ اللَّهَ يَجْعَل لَّهُ مَخْرَجًا وَيَرْزُقْهُ مِنْ حَيْثُ لَا يَحْتَسِبُ (٦٥:٢-٣)
Translation: Whoever is conscious of Allah, He will make a way out for him and provide for him from where he does not expect.
One must bear in mind, that saving oneself from ribā brings barakah about, and a home acquired with barakah, even if smaller or later, is better than one acquired at the cost of a contract that invites the curse mentioned above.
Accordingly, it is not permissible for you to purchase your primary residence through a conventional interest-bearing mortgage in the circumstances you described. Since purchasing is not required of you, you are not obliged to sell your apartments in Morocco for this purpose. Whether to keep or sell them is your own decision.
In the enquired situation, we advise you to continue renting. If your concern is affordability in the future, look for Shariah-compliant avenues to grow your wealth, such as halal investments, Shariah-screened equity funds, or a share in a lawful business, so that over time you build the means to purchase without ribā. Shariah-compliant home financing alternatives may also still be explored according to your own comfort, after you have satisfied yourself of their compliance with their respective Shariah boards.
We make du‘ā that Allah Ta‘ālā grants your family a home filled with barakah, ease in your children's studies, and security in your old age. Āmīn.
Allah knows best
Mufti Mirza-Zain Baig
And Allah Ta'ālā knows best.
Answered by
Mufti Mirza-Zain Baig
B.Ed, CSAA
Montréal, Canada · Canadian Centre for Islamic Research and Ifta
Have a question of your own?
Ask a Question